| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Nick Brassel <nick@tzarc.org>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Xelus22 <preyas22@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dexter93 <d3xter93@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Joel Challis <git@zvecr.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the mutual exclusive POINTING_DEVICE_MOTION_PIN and SPLIT_POINTING_ENABLE influence if and how the `pointing_device_driver.get_report` is triggered. now the way the define is wrapping around an "unbraced" if leads clang-format to weirdly indent the first line in the 'SPLIT_POINTING_ENABLE' as the first command after the if.
this hints that any code addition in between the two - that possibly should run regardless, would break the if-def enabled code.
this can be solved by adding a pair of curly braces in the POINTING_DEVICE_MOTION_PIN part, to clearly denote which commands are to be skipped if the motion pin shows now activity.
Co-authored-by: Johannes <you@example.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ryan <fauxpark@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #21396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
