Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Co-authored-by: Stefan Kerkmann <karlk90@pm.me>
Co-authored-by: Johannes <you@example.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: jack <0x6a73@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Duncan Sutherland <dunk2k_2000@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Drashna Jaelre <drashna@live.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan <fauxpark@gmail.com>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ryan <fauxpark@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: jack <0x6a73@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Drashna Jaelre <drashna@live.com>
Co-authored-by: Duncan Sutherland <dunk2k_2000@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan <fauxpark@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
the mutual exclusive POINTING_DEVICE_MOTION_PIN and SPLIT_POINTING_ENABLE influence if and how the `pointing_device_driver.get_report` is triggered. now the way the define is wrapping around an "unbraced" if leads clang-format to weirdly indent the first line in the 'SPLIT_POINTING_ENABLE' as the first command after the if.
this hints that any code addition in between the two - that possibly should run regardless, would break the if-def enabled code.
this can be solved by adding a pair of curly braces in the POINTING_DEVICE_MOTION_PIN part, to clearly denote which commands are to be skipped if the motion pin shows now activity.
Co-authored-by: Johannes <you@example.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Duncan Sutherland <dunk2k_2000@hotmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ryan <fauxpark@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Less/Rikki <86894501+lesshonor@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
Fixes #21396
|
|
Co-authored-by: Nick Brassel <nick@tzarc.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|